|
Checklist Item |
Exceeded
expectations |
Achieved competence |
Close to competence |
Working towards competence |
ICT Integration |
Balance |
Use of ICT is subtle, yet appropriate and the learning activities are the focus of proceedings. |
The balance between the use of ICT and the learning activities is equal, with neither dominating proceedings. |
ICT is either used excessively or not integrated to its full potential. |
The project is either totally focused on ICT skills or has minimal ICT integration. |
Does the use of ICT enhance the project? |
ICT is used imaginatively to significantly enhance the learning experience. |
ICT is integrated when it can make the project process more effective. |
The use of ICT is not always appropriate. |
The use of ICT is either overbearing or minimal/non-existent. |
Learning |
Do Curriculum-Framing Questions (CFQs) encourage learners to use higher-order thinking skills and explore issues in a challenging way? |
The Focus Question (FQ) is open-ended, aligned with project goals, and requires learners to use higher-order thinking. |
The FQ is open-ended, mostly aligned with project goals, and requires some higher-order thinking. |
The FQ is open-ended, but not clearly connected to the goals or higher-order thinking specific to the project. |
The FQ has pre-determined answers or is too broad to help learners focus their understanding. |
Does the Project Plan show how the learners meet the assessment standards? |
The Project Plan clearly shows how the work that learners do will help them meet the assessment standards. |
The Project Plan shows how the work that learners do will help them meet the assessment standards. |
The Project Plan shows that some of the work that learners do addresses assessment standards. |
The Project Plan shows that very little of the work that learners do addresses assessment standards. |
Does the project plan address 21st Century learning skills? |
Learners are supported to refine and develop relevant 21st Century skills on many occasions throughout the project. |
Learners are supported to refine and develop relevant 21st Century skills at some time during the project. |
Learners practice 21st Century skills during the project, but they receive little teaching and learning to support their development. |
Learners rarely use 21st Century skills during the project. |
Do learner samples address the CFQs in a meaningful way? |
The learner samples are at all times focused on providing a reasoned answer to the CFQs. |
The learner samples address CFQs, although there may be unnecessary information included. |
The learner sample, while interesting or attractive, does not really address the CFQs. |
The learner sample does not address the CFQs at all. |
Does the project address learner differences? |
The project provides well-defined and thoughtful accommodations to support diverse learners. |
The project provides accommodations to support diverse learners. |
The project provides minimal accommodations to support diverse learners. |
The project does not provide any accommodations to support diverse learners. |
Implementation |
Does Section C of the project plan give a clear outline of how project-based approaches can be implemented? |
The description is clear and methodical. Learners have many choices about how they demonstrate their learning. They create authentic products and performances developed through well-sequenced tasks and activities. |
Section C gives detail of the project process. Learners have some choices about how they demonstrate their learning. They create products and performances developed through connected tasks and activities. |
Section C has significant omissions in detail. Learners have few choices about how they demonstrate their learning. They complete discrete activities that do not connect to a final product or performance. |
Section C has very little useful description of the project process. Learners do not demonstrate their learning through products or performances. |
Assessment |
Do the assessment tools include criteria for the targeted learning outcomes? Do they focus sufficiently on learning? |
The assessment tools are detailed and formative. They cover the full range of project activities and learning outcomes. Criteria are unambiguous and clear. |
The assessment tools are clear and cover the learning outcomes and some project activities, but do not cover the full range of project activities. |
The assessment tools are incomplete and/or unoriginal and/or the language may be beyond the level of the learner. |
The assessment tools do not provide sufficiently clear guidance for the learner or assessor and/or the assessment tools are entirely inappropriate. |
Are the assessment tools varied? |
The assessment tools cover a wide variety of informal and formal methods throughout the phases to meet all five assessment purposes. |
The assessment tools cover informal and formal methods to meet all five assessment purposes. |
The assessment tools are used infrequently and in conventional ways to meet some assessment purposes. |
The assessment tools do not seem to serve any real purpose. |
Is the assessment strategy learner-centred? |
Learners contribute to the creation of assessments and frequently assess themselves and peers. |
Learners may contribute to the creation of assessments and assess themselves and peers. |
Learners may assess themselves and peers. |
Learners have little or no involvement in their assessment. |
Learner Support |
Do the tools scaffold learning to help learners develop new skills? |
The learner support tools are well-structured and will provide an excellent guideline for learners.
|
The learner support tools are clear and formative, without providing the best possible support. |
The learner support tools do not sufficiently provide the learners with clear guidance. |
The learner support tools provide no guidance to learners at all. |