IntelAssessing Projects : Types of Assessment
Assessment in Action


Conventional Assessment in the Classroom
In Joel’s chemistry class, he takes only one kind of assessment, a test or final project at the end of a sectin of work. When his class studies chemical bonds, for example, he reads the assigned chapter, listens as his teacher lectures, watches relevant videos, answers questions, and performs laboratory experiments, all in preparation for the exam. The test cannot ask him about everything, so it will ask questions that sample his knowledge while Joel must study or memorize everything that might be on the test. Unfortunately, although Joe’s teacher wants to improve learners’ higher-order thinking, it is likely that less than 10 percent of the test “will measure learner performance above the level of simple recall” (Beyer, 1987, p. 218).  

The learners in Joel’s class come with a variety of experiences with the topic. Some already understood much of the material and were ready for more in-depth study. Some may have never heard of the topic before and have been desperately trying to catch up through most of the time. Nevertheless, beyond some superficial interaction with the teacher, every learner receives the same teaching.  

The learners in the class approach an upcoming test from a variety of perspectives. Some learners are excellent test-takers or good memorizers and know they have to do little preparation. Others go through severe anxiety attacks before tests even when they know the material thoroughly. Joel usually studies quite a bit, but he is still anxious and hopes he will do well on his exams.  

On the day of the exam, the test, which has been kept secret, is administered, and learners fill in the answer in absolute quiet. The teacher watches carefully to make sure that no learners refer to their notes or ask classmates for help.  

A few days after the exam, when the class has moved on to the conservation of matter which depends on understanding of previous topics, Joel receives his test back, with his answers checked right or wrong, his essay evaluated, and a mark assigned. Joel sees that he got a B+, breathes a sigh of relief and puts the test in the back of his notebook without looking at it any further. A few learners discuss disputed items with the teacher. None of Joel’s classmates use the exam as an opportunity to reflect on their learning, to look for gaps in understanding, or to set goals for future learning, even when the teacher was careful enough to make constructive comments throughout the test. Furthermore, Joel’s teacher does not examine the test results systematically to collect information for future teaching because she is now busily working on the current section of work.

This all-too-common method of assessment is efficient and familiar to most learners, teachers, school managers and parents, but it fails to provide teachers or learners with the information they need to promote deep understanding of the subject / learning area.  

Consider, on the other hand, the experiences of a learner in a classroom where assessment occurs frequently for a variety of purposes.  

Formative Assessment in the Classroom
When Martha enters her chemistry class, her teacher conducts a large-class discussion on chemical bonding to determine what her learners already know about the topic. She then assigns a lab investigation and observes learners as they conduct their experiments, taking notes on their questions and discussions. The teacher notices that many of the learners are not using the higher-order thinking skills of analysis and generalization as they draw conclusions from the experiment, so she plans a lesson in which she teaches those skills directly. She observes their interactions after the teaching to determine if learners understood the skills and are using them effectively.  

When learners write in their journals at the end of each day, the teacher reads through them, looking for areas of common understandings and misunderstandings, as well as concepts that are proving particularly difficult for individual and groups of learners. She uses her findings to plan activities that will meet the needs of all her learners.  

As learners progress through the project, the teacher continually provides opportunities for them to think about their learning and to ask questions. She designs a performance task which requires learners to show that they understand the concepts associated with the project. Working with a small group, Martha will build a 3-dimensional computer model to illustrate chemical bonding. The teacher provides the group with a checklist to help them manage their time. She also makes a special point of taking observational notes about the learners’ collaboration skills. Martha and her group use a rubric describing the expected quality of the final project to monitor the quality of her work. When they receive a final assessment and mark for her project, they reflect on what they have learned and use that information to set goals for future learning.  

In this classroom, assessment is integral to teaching and learning. The teacher assesses learners while learners assess each other and themselves. The focus in this classroom is not on getting marks, although marks are given; it is, rather, on learning and improving thinking.

< Return to Types of Assessment